Free Trade Agreements- Market Freedom at the Expense of Individual Freedom?

Posted by on Jan 19, 2012 in Economic Rights, Past Events, Social Rights

This event, put on in January of 2012, discussed the economic pros and cons of Free Trade and take a look at how these agreements are affecting human rights on the ground and featured Kishore Kulkarni- JKSIS 

This event was co-sponsored by the Latin American Studies Association.

Click here to view flyer!

Click here to view video!

Relevant Research

Trade Integration, Neoliberal Reform, and Environmental Protection in Mexico: Lessons for the Americas

Abstract: Among Latin American countries Mexico is a model of neoliberalism’s environmental promise and pitfalls.  Since entering the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), it has undertaken extensive environmental reforms predicated on export-intensive industrialization and the growth of urban society.  An examination of these reforms, their background and statutory changes, policy measures, and international commitments made in this area since NAFTA took effect provokes serious concern over their adequacy as the American nations ponder the costs and benefits of deeper enmeshment in hemispheric trade integration.
Stephen P. Mumme
Latin American Perspectives , Vol. 34, No. 3, Contested Transformation (May, 2007), pp. 91-107
Article Stable URL: http://0-www.jstor.org.bianca.penlib.du.edu/stable/27648024

Why the Move to Free Trade? Democracy and Trade Policy in the Developing Countries

Abstract: Rising international trade flows are a primary component of globalization.  The liberalization of trade policy in many developing countries has helped foster the growth of these flows.  Preceding and concurrent with this move to free trade, there has been a global movement toward democracy.  We argue that these two trends are related: democratization of the political system reduces the ability of governments to use trade barriers as a strategy for building political support. Political leaders in labor-rich countries may prefer lower trade barriers as democracy increases.  Empirical evidence supports our claim about the developing countries from 1970-99.  Regime change toward democracy is associated with trade liberalization, controlling for many factors.  Conventional explanations of economic reform, such as economic crises and external pressures, seem less salient.  Democratization may have fostered globalization in this period.  

Helen V. Milner and Keiko Kubota
International Organization , Vol. 59, No. 1 (Winter, 2005), pp. 107-143
Published by: The MIT Press